{"id":"CAP-2","type":"capability","title":"Representation and evidence gap analysis","created":"2026-07-13","status":"offered with declared uncertainty","authors":["Upstream Zero"],"edges":[],"maturity":"experimental","body":"Systematic comparison of what an organization actually does against what\nits representations — human and machine-legible — allow an evaluator to\nverify: which requirements go unsubstantiated, which claims carry no\ncheckable evidence, and which capabilities are invisible to a machine\nreader.\n\n**Why this is marked experimental:** the analysis framework derives from\nthe research program's untested hypotheses (H-2 most directly) and no\npublished method yet backs it. It is diagnostic work performed carefully\nand labeled honestly.\n\n**What this cannot tell you:** that closing the gaps will change any\nparticular evaluator's recommendation. We measure and diagnose; we do not\npromise evaluator behavior.","url":"/capabilities/CAP-2","machineUrl":"/objects/CAP-2","referencedBy":[{"from":"ENG-2","rel":"exercises"},{"from":"ENG-5","rel":"exercises"},{"from":"ENG-6","rel":"exercises"}],"_meta":{"site":"Upstream Zero — Commercial Evaluation Observatory","version":"0.1","note":"Claims are presented at their evidence tier; Narrated is the lowest. Verify by walking edges, not by trusting us."}}